SRCDS Steam group


Q6600 Questions
#1
So I'm currently running a Q6600 box in a datacentre and just want a few questions answering regarding CSS slots.

I was wondering how many slots per core (If I assign the server to use 1 core) could it run at both 33 tick and 66 tick?

I was thinking about setting up a low tickrate huge CSS mega server...I'm talking like 60 slots.

Thanks for any replies!
Clan of Doom: www.clanofdoom.co.uk






Reply
#2
Well my server is xeon quad core 2.4 GHZ conroe, so it's pretty much a Q6600.

I can do 30 slot tf2 servers pretty decently.
you could prolly do more with css, u duno about 60 though, maybe at 33 tick.
Reply
#3
100 Tickrate takes 4 X the CPU usage as 33 tickrate
66 Tickrate takes 2.5 X the CPU usage as 33 tickrate
realchamp Wrote:
Hazz Wrote:Has someone helped you on these forums? If so, help someone else
Mooga Wrote:OrangeBox is a WHORE.
Reply
#4
We got ourselves a Q6600 a couple of weeks ago ...

Our goal was to run 2 100tick 16slot on each core but we're comming a bit short (and it's not a bandwidth problem)... it works but sometimes the tick drops on the core with 2 servers ...

Still investigating how to streamline the OS (windows 2003 server) have some more work to do there but not sure if that will do the trick.
Reply
#5
Hhhmm....

We I basically want to run a 64 slot 33 tick and even maybe 66 tick.

I know thats over the limit for 66 tick but it seems to work on these other mega servers.

Would 2 cores manage 64 slots @ 66 tick?
Clan of Doom: www.clanofdoom.co.uk






Reply
#6
You should be able to pull 40 slots 100 tick on each core of that really...

Hazz, it's always 1 core that does the job, SRCDS is not multithreaded.
I think you can come a pretty decent way running 64 players at 33 tick, I've ran 40 bots @ 33tick on a E6600 core without tickrate drops, since players use a lot less CPU it shouldn't be too much of a problem.
Join the Source Dedicated Server Support Group on Steam Community!
Source Dedicated Server (SRCDS)
Free to join, Live support! (When available)

http://forums.srcds.com/viewtopic/5114
Reply
#7
w00t.

Do you think I could push 64 slots?
Clan of Doom: www.clanofdoom.co.uk






Reply
#8
Yes, and here's some "inside" info for you, I've used this on one of my servers and it worked great:

64 players
66 tickrate
FPSBooster
fps_max 100

You shouldn't notice much tickrate drops at all, just at round starts it can drop quite a bit. I think the tickrate will start dropping around 35-40 players but it shouldn't drop below 33 tick any time. Just try a bit.
Join the Source Dedicated Server Support Group on Steam Community!
Source Dedicated Server (SRCDS)
Free to join, Live support! (When available)

http://forums.srcds.com/viewtopic/5114
Reply
#9
Awesome.

Could you explain how the lower fps on the server helps?
Clan of Doom: www.clanofdoom.co.uk






Reply
#10
Usually the strain on the CPU increases when more players join while running high FPS, in this case lowering it will make it way more stable and less CPU intensive which means you can run more slots. In theory you don't need more than 66 FPS anyway but to keep a "safe" distance from that number set it to max 100. Your server will run at an FPS around ~80 Which is perfectly fine.

EDIT: Be sure to set the affinity to 1!! core!
Join the Source Dedicated Server Support Group on Steam Community!
Source Dedicated Server (SRCDS)
Free to join, Live support! (When available)

http://forums.srcds.com/viewtopic/5114
Reply
#11
So the Q6600 would max out around 160 100tick slots?
Just thinking maybe for my next servers I might try out the Q6600's
Right now I am using the Xeons no issues yet. Have had only around 90 players on at one time so far with everything running very nice. But that was with dual quad core. Smile
My one server with 24 players on it @ 100 tick cpu usage maxed out around 58% Only thing is the price for Q6600 vs the Xeons.
Reply
#12
I vote for opterons way over any intel crap.
I just started a CPU war Big Grin.
realchamp Wrote:
Hazz Wrote:Has someone helped you on these forums? If so, help someone else
Mooga Wrote:OrangeBox is a WHORE.
Reply
#13
Big Grin I remember when I was asking to buy I was told screw amd Smile
Good times. My Xeons are working super good without any issues yet. WAR!
Reply
#14
Spartanfrog Wrote:I vote for opterons way over any intel crap.
I just started a CPU war Big Grin.

I don't think there will be any war, since intel rocks AMD with speed by far now, the new Phenoms are slower than the old Q6600's already.
AMD needs a superchip to even stay in the league with Intel already bringing up their new CPU which has testing benchmarks of almost 200% faster (Don't quote me on this, I've seen the test but can't find it anymore, don't know the exact gains etc.)
Join the Source Dedicated Server Support Group on Steam Community!
Source Dedicated Server (SRCDS)
Free to join, Live support! (When available)

http://forums.srcds.com/viewtopic/5114
Reply
#15
Big Grin I was a huge amd fan tell like 8 months ago. I was like I will never get intel. Times change things pretty good.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 2 Guest(s)