05-19-2009, 05:48 PM
i heard its not good to define a srcds process for only one CPU.
Choosing a kernel?
|
05-19-2009, 05:48 PM
i heard its not good to define a srcds process for only one CPU.
05-19-2009, 06:10 PM
it seems you have to try this out again. I have found it better not to asssign fixed CPUs, but others (maybe especially on quad cores) have found the opposite.
http://www.fpsmeter.org
http://wiki.fragaholics.de/index.php/EN:Linux_Optimization_Guide (Linux Kernel HOWTO!) Do not ask technical questions via PM!
05-19-2009, 09:17 PM
No, its definitely better assigning cores, like you mentioned
05-20-2009, 03:21 PM
i think your fps meter result is normal, if your are hosting more than 1 user/prozess/srcds per cpu at 1000 FPS. If you try the tut of BehaartesEtwas its very important to host only 1 user for each core. If you host more than you will get somethink like this....i tried it on a similar system...by hosting 150-200 Slots (no-go with an RT Kernel/1000HZ/chrt or taskset).
05-20-2009, 06:03 PM
unrealized Wrote:No, its definitely better assigning cores, like you mentioned I hate this kind of comments. On my system it's better *not* to assign the servers to cores. unrealized, you sure have not tested this on many systems, so don't say "definitely". back to the topic: I have seen better graphs, especially the drops are a little too deep. But you might need some luck with the chipset/mainboard for this, I don't know. are you sure that there were no map changes in between? those could explain this kind of drops (and you can ignore them then).
http://www.fpsmeter.org
http://wiki.fragaholics.de/index.php/EN:Linux_Optimization_Guide (Linux Kernel HOWTO!) Do not ask technical questions via PM! |
« Next Oldest | Next Newest »
|