Posts: 882
Threads: 43
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
13
09-12-2011, 08:34 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-12-2011, 08:43 PM by Mike.)
Hi,
I know this question has been asked at least a million times before, but here it goes again. What distro is the "best" in terms of stability, performance, custom kernels (easy to make them) and so on.
I've been using Ubuntu 11.04 and Debian 5 for almost a year now and I like them both. However when I tried to compile my own custom kernel on Ubuntu I got the dreaded kernel panic, unable to mount root filesystem. I know a lot of GSP's use Gentoo, but I haven't looking on it yet, how is it in comparison to Debian? Is it pretty easy to make a custom kernel on it?
Thanks,
Michael
Posts: 1,127
Threads: 22
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
10
Debian Squeeze with a customized kernel 3.0 is a great performer.
Slå den med jeres fiberforbindelser...
Posts: 882
Threads: 43
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
13
09-12-2011, 10:12 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-13-2011, 02:37 AM by Mike.)
Have you tried it? I'm considering to try it on one of my homeservers.
Edit: Wat.. the moment I reinstall a server, kernel.org is down...
Edit2: Would a Ubuntu 11.04 install + custom 3.0.0 kernel be as good as Debian with the 3.0.0 kernel?
Posts: 2,031
Threads: 27
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation:
17
I would prefer ubuntu (server edition) above debian, as ubuntu is a bit faster with new versions, but that is probably only a matter of preference... In fact, any distribution will do if properly modified, only ubuntu and debian will already be closest (kernel modification will suffice, or even without it will be already good).
Posts: 882
Threads: 43
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
13
So Ubuntu with a custom 3.0 kernel will do it?
Posts: 2,031
Threads: 27
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation:
17
you can even try without a custom kernel. I would change the kernel only if necessary...
Posts: 882
Threads: 43
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
13
With Ubuntu 11.04 desktop (wrong version lols) the fps was unstable like hell. It didn't even hit the 66.66 mark, it was only at 66.3 - 4 -2 and so on.
Posts: 1,127
Threads: 22
Joined: Sep 2008
Reputation:
10
I have tried out the debian squeeze with 3.0 kernel, yes. I tried to start 8 x 64 slot servers filled with bots on the testbox (a i7-2600K system) on 4 gigahertz, and it actually did it very well!
Slå den med jeres fiberforbindelser...
Posts: 882
Threads: 43
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
13
09-14-2011, 01:08 AM
(This post was last modified: 09-14-2011, 02:38 AM by Mike.)
I've installed Windows Server 2008 r2 SP1 on it. I'll just have to use that until kernel.org is up again. Even tho i hate Windows :s
Edit: I know that this is not the right section to ask but ill ask anyway, any optimisations i can do to Windows to get more stable fps?
Edit2: How would I go on creating an initial ram disk on Ubuntu 11.04 using kernel 3.0?
Posts: 882
Threads: 43
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
13
09-15-2011, 06:02 PM
(This post was last modified: 09-15-2011, 06:05 PM by Mike.)
Yep. I consider it as solved. However, after I did the kernel upgrade, i did apt-get update && apt-get upgrade it had to download 200 mb's of packages, and now /etc/debian_version is telling me that i'm running Wheezy/sid, I downloaded Squeeze, is this normal lol?
Posts: 2,031
Threads: 27
Joined: Nov 2008
Reputation:
17
maybe you somehow triggered a distupgrade? that cannot be related to the kernel upgrade...
Posts: 882
Threads: 43
Joined: Dec 2010
Reputation:
13
Very weird. All i did was:
dpkg -i kernel-image*
update-grub
apt-get upgrade
The last step is where it ran the upgrades.