SM vs MANI

[scorpio2k2]

hi,

Can u tell me what plugin u are using?

I'm not sure what plugin should i use

[Arjen]

Sourcemod safer. Many plugins.

[aksumka]

I started off using Mani, but since moved on to SM. Much better.

[Beaverbeliever]

Mani has major security issues. I would recommend to use Sourcemod, hands down.

[hankinator]

I believe firmly that mani is much better off for CSS servers. However, sourcemod is better for any other sourcegame. Mani is very easy when adding quake sounds and easy things like that. You can do a lot more with sourcemod; it just takes a lot of knowledge to tweak it perfectly.

[Mooga]

Mani has a LOT of security issues (or so I've been told). SM owns the server world. I personally used BM with TF2 for a while because it was the first to support OrangeBox. But while SM is a little most complicated to configure and set up, please say it's generally worth it.

[falcone]

Iam using mani now, first i had sourcemod , but many of my admins were not happy about sm, because the menu isn't so good and other things.
Also mani is much easier to edit adminrights

[Beaverbeliever]

If your server gets hacked, or something like that, be sure to take off Mani ASAP. It's not to hard for one to get the code to take down any server with Mani on it.

[Mooga]

(02-07-2010, 03:25 AM)Beaverbeliever Wrote:  If your server gets hacked, or something like that, be sure to take off Mani ASAP. It's not to hard for one to get the code to take down any server with Mani on it.

Realchamp was telling me how bad Mani is with security. He said that he's found several way to by-pass security and gain admin. Mani, however, claims that there are no risks... ya right.