2000fps #sourcekernel

[BehaartesEtwas]

dualcore1289 Wrote:And the human eye cant even see past 400-500fps anyways.

the humal eye can't see any difference past 40-50 fps (one "0" less!), but thats a different story (btw: movies have 24 fps).

the difference is, that a net engine needs to compensate for any latencies. that has serveral implications, in particular you need mechanisms like an interpolation of the data. In theory, the more often you calculate the more precise the prediction (you don't need to look too far into future). Also, in theory your predictions are more predictable ;-) if you do them regularily (i.e. your fps do not vary).

I bet nobody will notice any difference between 500 and 1000 fps, provided that both are running very stable. I doubt anyone has done any reliable test (you would need to do a blind testing, i.e. not give the test subjects the rcon pw, and e.g. switch between 500 and 1000 fps randomly after each round). But what I definitivly know is that stability has a big impact. A server with fps varying between 500 and 1000 fps is definitivly worse than a server running with constantly 500 fps.